Heathen Half Hour Podcast

Sunday, March 30, 2014

Religious Ridiculousness Strikes Again

This time to an 8 year old girl in Virginia.  The young girl was not allowed to return to her school on the grounds that she keeps her hair short and wears what would be considered boys clothing.  The school principal went as far as to say that unless the young girl and her family realize that god made her female and that she needed to act according to her "god-ordained identity" that the school was not the best place for her to continue her education.  

The school, a private christian school, can deny enrollment to those who condone homosexuality and alternative sexual identity.  Now as a private institution, the school has the right to do this and I would agree with their rights as long as they receive no federal funding for the school.  But just because I agree with the right for this school to deny enrollment based on christian values does not mean I agree wth their decision.  This is an 8 year old girl we're talking about here.

The real problem here is the message this action is sending to this young girl.  Obviously I don't know this young lady or her family but I don't think it's crazy to think that the message being sent to her by the school is that, in some way, she's not good enough.  Could you imagine going up to a child that ilooks up to you and telling that child they are not good enough to be around you?  What kind of effect do you think that could have?  

Now this may turn out to be a good thing.  There may be a silver lining that we are not yet able to see.  This young lady will no doubt be enrolled in another school where she will be accepted in as she is and hopefully get to continue her education without the fear of being bullied by school officials for just being who she is.  Honestly, I know many women who were considered "tomboys" when they were young.  Young girls who liked playing in the mud, catching bugs, and prefered wearing jeans over dresses.  In today's society however, there is no need to seperate this.  It should be equally accepted if a girl would rather wear jeans and a t-shirt or a boy wants to wear a princess dress to play in.  These children are just learning who they are and are at the starting point of finding their identity.

This is an unfortunate side effect of the the rights and freedoms we all have in this country.  Yes the school is a christian private school and yes they have a right to deny enrollment to this young girl but is this the best way for the school to address this situation.  This is just another example in a long list of examples where religion and religious belief negatively effect another young and impressionable child.

Sacrilege Sunday

Today is Sunday and as millions sit in churches praising myth and superstition, I sit here in awe of the fact scientific discovery and millions of years of evolution has allowed myself and so many others apply logic, reason, and skepticism to those religions.  This, coupled with the complete lack of evidence, has allowed so many to come to the conclusion that religions are nothing more than a collection of fairy tales.

Im happy that my life is meaningful here on a 4.5 billion year old piece of space dust.  I have heard many religious people say that life has no meaning without a belief in god.  To this I say bullshit.  Religious belief renders this life, the only one we get, meaningless because its dogma suggests this life is nothing more than a holy airport terminal and we're here just waiting to catch a heavenly flight to a final destination.

However, the rejection of belief in all the imaginary superpowerful soul police allows one to realize that we should make the most of the time we are alive and do good things for the betterment of each and every one of us.  There would less senseless violence in the name of imaginary douchebags and more scientific discovery that will allow us as humans to answer the most important of life's questions ourselves.

So as so many sit and worship a human created soul saver today (Yet will no doubt go home and break almost every rule in their "holy books"), I sit here with the notion that religion is nothing more than a way for people to feel better about the bad shit they've done and to avoid taking responsibility for their negative actions.  I mean who's fault is it really? Must be that talking snake who tempted a hungry naked woman to eat some fucking fruit right?  Seems totally legit.

-Zombie


Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Science Teachers and Religion by @rosalyncni


I grew up as a very religious child, without parental indoctrination. I started going to church casually with friends and just made it a habit to join them because they were mypeers, and all of my friends associated with church. Even without a lot of scientific knowledge, I also knew in my head that I didn’t truly believe in god. I just didn’t, I wanted to so badly and was terrified of hell and just not being able to hangout with my friends at church. While I was religious from about 6 to 14 years old, I just simply knew god wasn’t real and as I started to get into science and just basic logic, I found an immense amount of evidence to disprove god’s existence. Not just scientific knowledge but it was also brought to my attention how immoral Christianity is. With that said, being in high school, two of my science teachers I currently have in both of my courses are extremely religious. I find it hard to grasp how a well educated person, especially science teachers can still be so religious.


One of these science teachers has a bible clearly sitting on his desk. It says “BIBLE” in large, bold letters right next to a cross. Of course it bothered me, being an atheist and knowing he was a teacher in an American public school with religious items sitting blatantly on his desk. However, I didn’t feel a need to make a big deal out of it and he hadn’t spoken about religion to us as students. About a month or so ago, I overheard him in mid conversation with a group of students discussing religion. I don’t know what provoked the topic but he was having a casual conversation about how important faith is to him. I thought “fine, whatever.” Then a student said “Well, religion is manmade, there really isn’t evidence for it.” My science teacher proceeded to say “Yes, but so is evolution. Evolution is just as manmade as religion. There is no evidence to support evolution either. I can’t stand when I see people with the Darwin fish sticker on their cars. It’s ignorant to believe in evolution.” Needless to say I almost fell out of my chair. This is one of my current science teachers, who is a great man and I see him help many students out, but either way… no evidence exists for evolution?


Then my other science teacher. She is also a very kind women, I am aware she is religious because she recently moved into my area and was talking to some students about local churches. She had about a five minute conversation with various students about churches and why she enjoyed her previous church. Again, didn’t really care. I am used to many people around me talking about religion. But I’ve noticed when I have asked her questions about current things happening in science, she has absolutely no idea what I am talking about. There’s many examples but the most frequent thing I asked her was if she’s heard about the reviving of the show Cosmos with NeilDegrasse Tyson. She looked at me with a blank expression like I was speaking a different language, she asked me what Cosmos is and who Neil Degrasse Tyson is. I’ve asked her about various science topics, even one’s in the specific science subject she teaches and not once has she known what I am talking about.


These are only two experiences I have had with my current science teachers, there’s much more with my previous science teachers. What really strikes my nerve about all of this though, is not necessarily how much they wear their religion on their sleeve but their utter lack of major scientific knowledge. I have found the majority (definitely not all) of my science teachers simply do not know any science not only in general but in their subject outside of the curriculum of what they have to teach. They almost don’t even have a passion for the subject and this bothers me. I think to be an efficient teacher, you must be at least somewhat intrigued by your subject. When you are a teacher and don’t care much about your subject, not only do you not go into detail about the information and possibly not give correct or fully explain certain information but you also don’t give students the passion/interest they should or could possibly have in the subject. Being in this public school system my whole life, I have found that the majority of all my teachers lack so much education about their subject and simply got thrown into whatever position was open and handed a textbook, which is the extent of their knowledge. I am a firm believer that teachers have a job to set the roots for encouraging students to be active in that subject and how can some teachers do that with no interest in the important information they’re in charge of teaching?

 

(I am aware this is not all teachers. Some of the most intelligent people I’ve ever met are teachers. I am also aware a lot of teachers do have a massive amount of knowledge about their subjects are truly care about what they do. This is just something I have personally noticed about the majority of my teachers in my particular public schooling system.)


By: @rosalyncni on Twitter

For A Friend...

With the American Atheist convention just a few weeks away I wanted to pass along to you a shout out and show of support for our friend David also known as @GammaAtheist. 

If you have ever had the privlage of watching one of the numerous #AtheistHangouts created by David you know that he works his ass off to provide great entertainment and great guests. How he does all of this is beyond me. 

I was lucky enough to be invited to be on one of these hangouts not long after I joined Twitter and since then we have become pretty good friends. He has helped me promote this blog as well as the podcast I do even though I'm just another podcaster/blogger in an endless sea of internet information. 

That being said, in what may be considered a small gesture of appreciation, I decided to do the following...

I'm lucky enough to be attending the convention along with friends like David and Dan Arel and many others. And of course, having a blog and podcast myself, I would love to talk and write about my experience however I have decided not to. Instead I will simply encourage everybody to visit the following website and consider becoming a patron for David and Atheist Hangouts. http://www.patreon.com/GammaAtheist

David stated that he is going to provide some bonus material from the convention to patrons and, as a friend, I will not post anything that would take may take away from that. So for what I can assume will be great content, please consider visiting the website mentioned above to gain access to great bonus material from this years American Atheist Convention.

-Zombie

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

My Road to Reason by @mayrrra_tx

Family gatherings should be the last place that you feel out of place. In my case, it’s the exact opposite. The reason for this uneasiness is due to the fact that I am an atheist in a family of Catholics. Being that they are my family, I try not to let our beliefs come between us.  Although sometimes biting your tongue does you no justice.

Growing up, my family and I attended church every Sunday. My sisters, cousins, and I also participated in CCD every Saturday. I never really questioned any of these traditions in any way. Although, I do remember having so many unanswered questions, I never really wanted to ask for the answers because I knew that they would just lead to more questions. I would just be going in a circle. It wasn't until middle school when I began to question whether I was truly a Catholic or not. I remember watching so many series about evolution on TV and it just seemed to make more sense to me than what I was taught to believe. I never really spoke up about my change in mind until I started high school. Once I began making small remarks about me not believing in God, my parents didn't take it well. I knew that they wouldn't because it wasn't what they taught me nor wanted to believe.

They began giving me reasons on why I was thinking in that way. Those reasons being: my peers, what I watch on TV,and most importantly, the music I listen to. Little did they knowthat most, if not all, of my friends believed in God. They went to church just as much as our family did and always invited me. I just never went. My dad also noticed that I was constantly explaining to him about how we as humans came to be. He always said otherwise, but I kept on ranting about how it made more sense. Lastly, they also assumed that because I began listening to rock/metal that it somehow made me lose my faith. They were nothing but wrong.

My perception of religion changed due to the fact that religion made no sense to me. How was I supposed to believe that there was a man in the sky that controlled my fate? How was I supposed to pray for something that I wanted to happen instead of work for it? I can't seem to count how many times my family has made remarks about my being an atheist, especially when we have family gatherings celebrating a holiday or just a party. At first, it really bothered me that they didn't accept my beliefs. But if my parents taught me anything, it was to stand up for what I believe in and stand my ground. I soon came to realize that I was just as much entitled to my lack of belief as they are entitled to their religious beliefs.

Now that my entire family knows about my lack of religion, they don't seem to care about it much anymore. They no longer try to force church on me. They realized that I'm not going to change my mind. They still make small remarks here and there, but definitely not as much as they once did. No matter what they say, my mind is set. Religion isn't needed in order for me to get to where I plan on being. I determine who I am, what I do and where I'll be.

By @mayrrra_tx

Monday, March 24, 2014

The Unnatural Spread of Religion by @ScholarMrsV


I often wonder what it is like to be a teenager in the extreme Bible Belt community where I teach.  I am curious how they view their religions.  Do they REALLY buy into the hype, or do they just claim to believe what they are told to believe?  I’ve already disclosed in my last post the hypocrisy that I deal with here, and how I’ve witnessed many who do not live the life that they claim to live, one based on the beliefs that they claim to hold.  My students often bring up church, in conversations with each other.  They discuss having went to church on the weekend, or bible study during the week, oftentimes in a way of speaking that does not portray excitement or fulfillment.


Today, in the elective class that I teach for career readiness, my students were instructed to write down the top twenty things that they enjoy doing with their time.  Out of twenty-seven students, only two placed “going to church” on their list.  This realization, that church is not their top priority, got me thinking about childhood indoctrination, as well as the other unnatural ways in which religions have spread, infecting our world in an obscene way.  


I grew up in South Louisiana, in a Catholic family, but a “southern” Catholic family.  That means that we were “Catholic” but did not attend church except for weddings and funerals (thankfully!).  My mother sent me to bible study in my teenage years, because it was expected, but I spent that time daydreaming, on the days that I didn’t skip out.  I remember sitting in these classes, and in church, listening to the priest, and thinking about how ridiculous he sounded.  I remember reading the bible at twelve, and not believing a thing in it.  I claimed to be Catholic because I did not know that there was anything else.  I thought that I was the only person in the world who didn’t believe in “God.”  There was no such thing as a nonbeliever in my community.  I didn’t believe, but I was alone.  Knowing my own story reminds me that many of my students, those who did not put church on their top twenty, may be in the same boat as I was at their age.  


Looking at my own children, specifically my seven year old daughter, I see how hard a parent must have to work in order to indoctrinate a child into believing such hogwash.  My daughter was raised in a secular home.  No magic, no superstition, just facts and love.  She asked me one day about what was “God” and why did people believe in it.  She laughed when I mentioned people believing that a man lived in the sky and made things happen magically.  She reminded me that we’ve been in plane many times, and that my husband is a pilot, and we’ve NEVER seen a man in the sky.  Her mind may be young, but she is not gullible, and was never brainwashed into believing something that simply isn’t natural.  On one occasion, her teacher inappropriately mentioned “angels” in class.  My daughter came immediately home to tell me.  She said: “Mommy, if there were ladies flying around I would have seen them!”  I told her that she was absolutely correct, and that angels were not real.  I do not believe, not even for a second, that a young mind would naturally create a “god” in their own minds, without being fed this story by someone whom they trust.  And this realization disgusts me.  These children are not Christian children, Muslim children, or any other religion; they are shaped that way, and it is wrong.

Later in my work day, I was teaching “Russification” to my seniors, and that is when this blog topic further brewed in my mind.  For those who do not know, “Russification” was when Czar Alexander II of Russia forced all people living within the Russian grasp to adopt Eastern Orthodoxy.  It did not matter what their religious beliefs were up until that point; they had no choice but to convert.  You see, most theists don’t understand the history of their religion.  They don’t understand that Christianity, Islam, and Buddhism have spread their claim by missionary work, unlike other faiths.  They don’t understand the extent of forced conversions by the Muslims and Christians: the Inquisition and Russification are only a small portion of the history of these religions.  Christianity was forced on so many, and still is today.  Arabic Muslims invaded much of Africa, and traded with them as well, spreading their disease.  Emperors who converted to Christianity for political reasons, invaders who converted for land, Aboriginal people who converted for their lives; there is nothing natural about the spread of religion.  There will never be a child who is born and will speak of Allah without being told, and there will never be an aborigine who will speak of him either.  They may create their own imaginary friends, but not these.  These religions are spread by the ideas of punishment and reward.  Do what you are told or suffer.  It is forced; it is not natural.


As I teach these moments of history I hope that my students realize that their religions are not what they are told, and that they are being brainwashed to believe something that their common sense tells them is impossible.  Everything is resting on their ability to recognize the deceit and break their chains as I broke mine so many years ago.

 

@ScholarMrsV

A New Champion

In recent history my Sundays have been dominated by The Walking Dead and all of its gruesome glory. Everything else that I watched on Sundays was placed nice and neat into the DVR to be viewed at a later time.

All this changed 3 weeks ago with the release of Cosmos. When it first heard that Cosmos was in the works I was quite excited to say the least. And to be hosted by Neil Degrasse Tyson? Well that just pushed me over the top. For years I've watched and listened to lectures by Dr. Tyson so to say I was stoked that he was to host the new Cosmos would have been an understatement. 

So there I was on March 9th firmly planted in my chair anxiously awaiting 8pm. And then it began...

What I didn't realize was that for the hour that followed I was sitting, literally, on the edge of my seat. I hung on every word of that episode. At times I even applauded the television. I was blown away by, not just the visual effects of the show, but more so by the information that I had the honor of listening to. I was truly amazed.

As the episode neared its end, as Dr. Tyson stood on that cliff and paid tribute to Carl Sagan, I realized that, for the first time in a long time, I was truly moved by a television program. Moved to the point of goosebumps.  I was moved because I realized that what I just watched may very well turn out to be one of the most important scientific television programs to inspire the next generation of scientists. I was reminded of the plea Bill Nye made during his debate with Ken Ham where he implored citizens to encourage scientific discovery and discard myth. I felt that I had just watched the giant first step in the fight to save science education from being poisoned by myths and fairy tales.  And now that we are 3 episodes in, my opinion has only been strengthened.  

The true beauty of this series is that, for the first time in years, I can imagine a young person firmly seated in front of their television, excited about science. And the payoff of this could be priceless. 

This is my virtual standing ovation to the new champion of my Sunday evenings....Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey.

-Zombie

Saturday, March 22, 2014

The Starting Line

 
We all know the stories of parents refusing medical treatment or vaccines for their children in favor of prayer.  We all know the all too common result of such delusional decisions.  I’m sure we can all list numerous instances in history where a religious belief directly resulted in vast loss of human life.  Those examples are easy ones when referring to the dangers of religious belief. 

Here’s a statement that you may or may not have thought about as being dangerous:

 “I’m going to leave it in god’s hands”

I’m referring to that statement as it pertains to the day to day struggles each and every one of us face.  That may not sound as dangerous as the examples I gave at the beginning but hold that thought.

Suppose a family is going through some financial trouble.  Money is so tight that it’s a complete struggle just to put food on the table and that balance in the bank is smaller each and every month.  What do you suppose would happen if one of the adults said “I’m going to leave it in god’s hands” and simply did nothing else to better their situation?

Take a couple having relationship troubles.  They have arguments and fights constantly.  Zero communication with one another.  What do you think would happen if one or both of them just said “I’m going to leave it in god’s hands” and did nothing else to better their relationship? Do you think it would last?

A student didn’t study for a test at school and on the day of the exam stared at the test and said confidently “I’m going to leave it in god’s hands” and began marking answers.  Do you think he or she would pass?

There’s a seemingly endless amount of examples of what if scenarios but I chose the above because these are examples I’ve witnessed first hand.  The family pretty much went broke, the couple split up, and the student failed the test. 

But Zombie, although these are bad things what makes these things fall into the category of dangerous?

Here’s the dangerous part.  What if the opposite had happened?  What if the family suddenly came into some money without working for it?  The couple stayed together?  The student passed the test? Although unlikely, these things could have happened.  The dangerous part is that now the person with the already strong religious beliefs is now convinced this way of thinking is an acceptable substitute for the hard work required in the above scenarios.  And what can this way of thinking lead to?  See the first paragraph of this post.  The examples in the first paragraph aren’t where the danger started.  That’s the horrible result of a religious belief that had much simpler beginnings. Possibly with something as small as passing a test on faith alone……

-Zombie

Friday, March 21, 2014

Hypocrisy…Again by @ScholarMrsV


Many Christians choose to discount many of the laws of the Old Testament, especially those that deal with eating pork and seafood (if you live in the south!)  Although most Christians would say that these dietary restrictions are in the Old Testament and not in the New Testament, they cannot discount the Old Testament as not applying to themselves.  They use the Old Testament in those cases which are convenient for them; for example by using the ridiculous “creation” story or the story of Noah, both from Genesis, but choose to discount those laws of the Old Testament that they feel are too difficult to live by.  Jesus tells them through Matthew: “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law of the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.  For the truly I tell you, until the heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.” (Matthew 5:17-18)  If the bible is the “infallible word of god” then should it not be followed completely by those who claim to be its followers?  Did the genocidal, overbearing god of the Old Testament choose to change his inflexible laws after having his son?  For such an omnipotent and omniscient being, it is hard to believe that the laws that he so strictly enforced could be so easily changed. 
It is, however, understandable that some of the bible’s laws do not jive with today’s ever progressive society, but shouldn’t god have anticipated that?  Is he not all-knowing?  For example, Leviticus 20:9 states: “For every one that curseth his father or his mother shall be surely put to death: he hath cursed his father or his mother; his blood shall be upon him.”  Surely, in modern society, parents cannot go around killing their children for talking back, but doesn’t the Lord order it?  Did he not order the murder of Isaac by Abraham and was Abraham not expected to obey?(Genesis 22)  This story of Abraham’s willingness to murder his own son, as God claims to do with his own son in the New Testament, is shown as a truly noble act, versus as awful parenting and deranged priorities.  As a Christian, or a Jew, should you not follow his order as well?  Most of us in a relatively moral society would say that this is a heinous order, to kill your child, but these types of events still happen in today’s society.  In 2011, a mother from Florida killed her two teenage children because she said that they were being “mouthy. A representative for the presiding police department stated: “But I don’t think that will ever serve as an explanation to the rest of us how you could take a child’s life.” (www.cbsnews.com/news/julie-powers-schenecker-kills-kids-for-talking-back-say-police/)
Whether or not she was following the order of the bible, or was simply acting in a moment of enraged passion, is irrelevant.  What is important to note is that the mother was arrested and condemned for doing exactly what the bible, a book that claims to hold ultimate morality, orders to be done.  What this reveals is that the bible does not deserve to hold the monopoly on morality, because society is more moral than the bible.  Without reading the bible, most people would admit that killing their children is horrific, and immoral.  However, those who claim to be followers of the bible must own this law just as they claim to own the others.
Written by: @ScholarMrsV on Twitter

Tuesday, March 18, 2014

Hypocrisy in the Bible Belt by @ScholarMrsV


One of the things that has been most evident to me while working in the Bible Belt has been the hypocrisy.

Something that happened to me recently has been really bothering me on this issue.  Working in Central Louisiana, I am in the belly of the Bible Belt.  I have five different Christian churches within a block of my house.  Lucky me.  I play “dodge the churchgoer” when I drive down the streets on Sunday mornings.

As a world history teacher, you can imagine the toe stepping that I have to do when teaching events such as the Crusades, Reformation, or the Inquisition, but I do my best to be as unbiased as possible.  I am a professional, after all.

I have a large group of Catholic students in my senior-level class and the girls in that class enjoy talking about their religion quite a bit; they enjoy talking about EVERYTHING actually.  I don't usually discuss religion with them; I just listen in to what they say.  I don't typically get involved in their conversations because I know the Establishment Clause quite well, for my own protection, so I don't agree or disagree with their feelings on religion; I just listen and give any feedback based on laws, history, or science.  One day the girls were sitting in my room and discussing their feelings on the Catholic religion, actually they’ve done this on many occasions.  They were talking about how they have all been on birth control for many years and that they disagree with the sex before marriage restrictions, how they think that priests should get married, and one of the girls was even so bold as to say that she thinks that the story of the Immaculate Conception is silly.  So these girls claim to be Catholic, even devout Catholics, yet they can sit in my room, among other students, and voluntarily bash the core beliefs of their religion, yet they don't see that this as hypocritical.  If I had done that, I would be in court.

To my surprise, I found out pretty recently that one of the girls in this group, the one that even went as far as to not believe the story of Immaculate Conception, was talking about me at a school event.  She was telling another teacher and some other people that I try to make them not believe in Jesus and that they are blown away by the stories that I tell them and the things that I teach them in history class.  For example, they just learned about the Inquisition, which was quite upsetting to them.  When this got back to me I was absolutely furious because I've done nothing but teach them history and never tried to sway them to disbelieve in Jesus.  However, if learning the history made them doubt their beliefs in Jesus, then that was them using their own reasoning skills, and not my persuasion.

When I confronted the girl about her rumor spreading, when we were alone, and told her what I had heard, and that I was a very upset because she knows that I've never told her to stop believing in Jesus and that I only taught her history, she denied saying it.  Then she proceeded to tell me that they were “blown away” by some of the things that they learn in my class because they are devout Catholics.  I told her that medical school would be difficult for her if she was going to be that offended by history, because she would come into contact with many more facts, both scientific and historical, in college, that may go against her religion, or make her offended, or get her to question things.  That pissed her off, no doubt, but she is growing into adulthood, and needs to hear it.

How can she claim to be a devout Catholic, when she sat in front of me talking adversely about every core belief that Catholics hold?

Although the hypocrisy in the Bible Belt goes much further than this one story, this story really bothers me as a teacher when I feel as though the senior class gets so much of me.  I give so much to help them to be ready for college and even give them extra time when they have to study for another class.  I also try my best to be sensitive to their beliefs and heritage, while still preparing them for the future and getting them to understand facts, even if those facts contradict what it is that they may have already believed.  Because no matter what they believe, I am only there to teach them world history, nothing else, and therefore if the history contradicts what they believe, then facts are facts, and facts don't discriminate. 
 
Written by: @ScholarMrsV on Twitter

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

A Well Deserved Thank You


I think it's been almost a year since I joined and became somewhat active in the Twitter universe. I did so with the intention of getting to discuss atheism and secular topics since the extremely Christian area in which I live offered no such outlet.

I've never been a social media person. Honestly I thought it was a waste of time. However, when I became more vocal about my atheism I found it difficult to find people to relate to. You're almost shunned in a way. Of course I had my wife (also an atheist) but as she was entrenched in her pursuit of her masters degree and her free time ledger was always in the red. So that's when I decided to give social media a shot.

What I didn't expect, and frankly thought was impossible, was the friendships that have been made with people I've never met in person. Had you told me that prior I would have simply laughed at you. What I have come to realize is that I truly enjoy the daily conversations with my friends on Twitter more than the interactions with some of the people I knew prior. The amount of intellilectual stimulation is endless.

That being said I want to thank you, my Twitter friends, for providing vast amounts of inspiration and great daily conversations. You have inspired me, in so many ways, to become more active and vocal in the secular community. I've expanded my understanding of so many things and I have you to thank. 

So thank you. I obviously can't list every single person but below are some of the people who have inspired me the most...

Thank you!

-Zombie



Sunday, March 9, 2014

AACON14


I don't know about you but I'm super excited about the upcoming American Atheist Convention in Salt Lake City.  This is just a quick reminder that if you are planning on going but haven't yet registered for the convention you should probably do so. 

Dave Silverman was a guest on the show Dogma Debate with David Smalley a week and a half ago where he mentioned that the possibility of a sell out was pretty high. 

Click on the link below and it will take you to the American Atheist website where you can obtain all the info on the list of speakers, schedule of events, and to register for the convention.  I really hope to see many of you there. 

-Zombie

American Atheists

Saturday, March 8, 2014

Atheist Organizations...Why Bother...

There are numerous atheist and secular organizations that exist throughout the country.  From national organizations such as American Atheists and the United Coalition of Reason down to state and local groups in most states in the country. 

That being said, a question was posed during a twitter discussion on the necessity and purpose of these organizations.  There were some who held the opinion that being a member of such organizations simply took the place of church.  Others held the opinion that being an atheist should be irrelevant these secular groups mission statements.

I respect the opinions of these individuals and the individuals themselves but I respectfully disagree.  I find that atheist and secular organizations are highly important in today's society for a variety of reasons.

The first, and most glaring reason in my opinion, is the fact in the continued fight for separation of church and state one must be organized.  Those who attempt to pass legislation to further a religious agenda, to restrict the rights of portions of our society, etc. are highly organized.  That's why you see bills almost pass that allow discrimination. Its because these religious groups are highly organized.  Therefore organizations that fight for the separation of church and state, fight to stop laws that allow discrimination, fight to stop state education boards from including myth in science classrooms, are a necessity.  There are states where individuals can't hold a public office if said person is atheist/secular.  These organizations stand up to things like this as well.

As for including the term "Atheist" or "Secular" in the title of these organizations my opinion on this comes from a more personal level.  There are many times and many instances where the term "atheist" is met with such negativity that people lose relationships, lose jobs, are shunned or disowned by family, and threatened with violence.  There is such a misunderstanding by the religious as to what atheism is that negativity is typically the first reaction.  That's where including the term "atheist" in the titles of these organizations becomes important.  Not only is it an indication to those who feel outcast because of their atheism that they are not alone, but it allows the term atheist to start to be associated with positive reactions as opposed to negative ones. 

For example, a tornado comes through a town and destroys homes and businesses.  Included in those buildings that were destroyed is a church.  Now lets say a group called "Local Atheists" volunteer to helps with the cleanup and maybe even the rebuilding of that church.  What does that do?  Not only does it help members of the community in need, but it can immediately create a positive association between the term atheist and individuals that may have thought only negatively towards atheists before.  Ultimately that positive association can lead to productive discussions and understanding between secular and religious members of the same community. 

Its for these reasons, as well as numerous others, that I'm proud to me a member of several organizations.  There will be individuals who agree and disagree with me on this topic.  But that's the beauty of this.  Just because we're atheist doesn't mean we will agree on every point.  But as always, the conversations are welcome.

-Zombie